* update local-path-storage config template to version v0.0.19
* changes local_path_provisioner image tag to v0.0.19
* removes copy paste example from rancher local-path-provisioner repo
According to the following recommendation, this moves the directory
to control-plane:
The Kubernetes project is moving away from wording that is considered
offensive. A new working group WG Naming was created to track this work,
and the word "master" was declared as offensive. A proposal was formalized
for replacing the word "master" with "control plane".
Fixes the following error when using Bastion Node with the sample config.
```
fatal: [bastion]: FAILED! => {"msg": "The task includes an option with an undefined variable. The error was: 'dict object' has no attribute 'bastion'\n\nThe error appears to be in '/home/felix/inovex/kubespray/roles/bastion-ssh-config/tasks/main.yml': line 2, column 3, but may\nbe elsewhere in the file depending on the exact syntax problem.\n\nThe offending line appears to be:\n\n---\n- name: set bastion host IP\n ^ here\n"}
```
Previous check for presence of NM assumed "systemctl show
NetworkManager" would exit with a nonzero status code, which seems not
the case anymore with recent Flatcar Container Linux.
This new check also checks the activeness of network manager, as
`is-active` implies presence.
Signed-off-by Jorik Jonker <jorik@kippendief.biz>
This was introduced in 143e2272ff
Extra repo is enabled by default in CentOS, and is not the right repo for EL8
Instead of adding a CentOS repo to RHEL, enable the needed RHEL repos with rhsm_repository
For RHEL 7, we need the "extras" repo for container-selinux
For RHEL 8, we need the "appstream" repo for container-selinux, ipvsadm and socat
Signed-off-by: Etienne Champetier <champetier.etienne@gmail.com>
Only checking the kubernetes api on the first master when upgrading is not enough.
Each master needs to be checked before it's upgrade.
Signed-off-by: Rick Haan <rickhaan94@gmail.com>
yum_repository expect really different params, so nothing to factor here
Ubuntu is not an ansible_os_family, the OS family for Ubuntu is Debian
Check for ansible_pkg_mgr == apt
Signed-off-by: Etienne Champetier <champetier.etienne@gmail.com>
we don't need rpm_key, so nothing to factor here
Ubuntu is not an ansible_os_family, the OS family for Ubuntu is Debian
Check for ansible_pkg_mgr == apt
Signed-off-by: Etienne Champetier <champetier.etienne@gmail.com>
Here the desciption from Ansible docs
Corresponds to the --force-yes to apt-get and implies allow_unauthenticated: yes
This option will disable checking both the packages' signatures and the certificates of the web servers they are downloaded from.
This option *is not* the equivalent of passing the -f flag to apt-get on the command line
**This is a destructive operation with the potential to destroy your system, and it should almost never be used.** Please also see man apt-get for more information.
Signed-off-by: Etienne Champetier <champetier.etienne@gmail.com>
